Authors writing themselves into their works is nothing new. Many people think the young man who slipped out of his linen clothes to elude his captors and ran away naked from the garden of Gethsemane was the Apostle Mark himself. And, in As You Like It, there’s a slightly dim-witted countryman called William who seems to have no real purpose in the play – is this the Bard making game of himself?
You can see I’m not talking Mary Sues here, although some self-inserted characters come perilously close. I find the wikipedia description of these women or their male equivalent, the Gary Stu – useful, that they’re primarily functioning as wish-fulfillment fantasies for their authors. Many of the ‘author appearances’ make the feet of clay all too apparent and so don’t fit into this category.
Autobiographically inspired novels like ‘On the Road’ clearly portray the writer and his/her friends, foibles and all, to some extent or other. Sal Paradise is Jack Kerouac, ‘Jeannette’ in ‘Oranges are not the Only Fruit’ is Jeannette Winterson and Philip Carey in ‘Of Human Bondage’ may be Somerset Maugham, more or less. Paul Morel in ‘Sons and Lovers’ could be the young D H Lawrence and elements of Dickens’ life appear in David Copperfield.
Not E M Forster (and not too much like the Maurice Hall of the book?)
Sometimes, though, the reader sees what he or she wants. E M Forster insisted that Maurice Hall wasn’t him, although the similarities in appearance, Cambridge background and sexual awakening by a man of ‘lower class’ has made fans of ‘Maurice’ wonder. Harriet Vane is evidently based on Dorothy L Sayers – similar educational background, similar unhappy love affair – although she possesses too many faults to be a Mary Sue. Except in one thing; Sayers was infatuated with Eric Whelpton (one of the models for Peter Wimsey), but to no avail. Could Harriet’s happy ending with Peter have been a bit of wish-fulfilment?
Certainly in fanfic the wish-fulfilment element looms large. In Age of Sail stories, there’ll be a young woman who’s beautiful, talented, clever, witty; a right pain in the bum. She’s the best shot on the ship and can probably outdo the officers at swordplay. She might even be in disguise as a man, some very capable second lieutenant. I’m struggling to think of an equivalent character in a major novel written by a woman, although two male characters spring immediately to mind – James Bond and Stephen Maturin. This pair of bold adventurers need no introduction, nor do their stories. Ian Fleming based Bond and his adventures on various people and incidents, including his own – for example some of the scenes in Casino Royale reflected his own attempt to scupper some gamblers he thought were Nazi agents.
Maturin fascinates me, as does his creator, Patrick O’Brian. It would be easy to overegg the similarities between the two – secrecy, dissimulation about background, a daughter with special needs – but the fact remains that Maturin at times feels like a Gary Stu, despite his faults. Brilliant shot, wonderful espionage agent, a bit of a super hero (he takes a bullet out of his own abdomen and survives torture, storms, abandonment on a scorching hot island, a night on a freezing cold mountain, etc). I can’t help wondering if O’Brian was using Maturin in part to be what he’d wished to be, (or pretended he’d been) including a spy, an Irishman and a wonderful father to his disabled child.
Vane/Sayers
Self inserted characters exist today. There’s a lady in my Cambridge Fellows books who bears more than a passing resemblance to me and I know that there are others knocking around. Of course, the tendency is, when I’m reading something, to try to spot a character who might just be the author in disguise. I daren’t say anything because of the risk of a suit for libel, but might that beautiful lady in the latest book by xxxx really be her and can that ridiculously sexy man, the one all the blokes fawn over truly be yyyyy? And will you share your favourite ‘self-inserted’ characters in the comments?
September 16, 2010 at 11:46 am
I will admit nothing more than to quote the estimable F. Scott Fitzgerald when he said (clearing throat) “All my characters are me. Even the [wo]men are me.” ^___^
September 16, 2010 at 12:08 pm
Hee hee. I like the cut of your jib and might have to plead guilty to the same. (Jonty certainly does some things which are me, all over!)
Charlie
September 16, 2010 at 2:16 pm
I did once do a very deliberate author self insert in a piece of fanfiction, but that was to make the point that even author-insert modern-girl-falls-into-Middle-earth stories didn’t /have to be/ ghastly Mary Sues. (I think I managed to do one that wasn’t.)
The rest of the time, I’m with FitzGerald, in that all of the characters are me a bit, and none of them are entirely.
I wonder if Maturin being a bit of a Sue is the reason why I can’t warm to him the way I can to Jack Aubrey with all his faults?
September 16, 2010 at 2:49 pm
Ooh – does that piece of fanfic still exist? (I nearly used the ‘modern-girl-falls-into-middle-earth’ scenario as my Mary Sue example.)
I love Maturin, but he seems a bit…I don’t know, disjointed? Inconsistent?
Charlie
September 18, 2010 at 8:09 pm
It certainly does (sorry I didn’t reply before but for some reason I haven’t been getting the notifications.)
You can find it here:
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/1391106/1/Magnetic_Force
Disjointed is a good word for it. I find him very amusing but cold – not entirely human somehow.
September 18, 2010 at 8:15 pm
Ooh – just skimmed that and saw UMIST (my second choice Uni!) and Fortean Times. This will be good.
*mwah*
September 16, 2010 at 2:41 pm
I know that Stephen King does this a lot in his stories. Very often the hero–or one of the heroes–will be a best-selling writer…and frequently one who’s hated by the literati, His writers are generally pretty flawed, though.
Then again, there are a lot of definitions of Mary Sue and Gary Stu.
September 16, 2010 at 2:47 pm
*nods on both counts*
Where does self insert end and Gary Stu start? I quite like the idea of authors depicting a person like themselves so long as they’re not totally sickening.
🙂
Charlie
September 16, 2010 at 2:48 pm
Sayers was an interesting character herself, in the same way O’Brian was–brilliant writer but probably not someone one would find a comfortable friend. I do think Maturin was what O’Brian wished he might have been–he certainly treated Diana more kindly in fiction than his real-life wife treated him. I know the story is that he deserted her and their child… but he was in London during WW2, working in Intelligence; thousands of men similarly ‘deserted’ families at the time. One of those cases where we’ll probably never know the whole story.
I tend to give characters bits of myself rather than inflict the whole package on anyone–Will Marshall’s bruised idealism, David Archer’s sarcasm… One character who probably looks like a self-insertion is the lesbian massage therapist in Walking Wounded, but that’s not the case at all–Pat and Tess were based on friends of mine who were trying for a baby and had lost the first one, so writing a happy outcome for them was kind of sympathetic magic.
September 16, 2010 at 2:55 pm
That bit about him working in intelligence is one of the things I can’t pin down. His biographers have mentioned it, I think, but the more recent revelations that started in the Daily Telegraph a few years back have discredited his having a spying role – ambulance driver if I remember correctly? Certainly not Irish nor with the original name Patrick O’Brian.
I like the story about your friends – did they have a happy outcome?
Charlie
September 16, 2010 at 4:39 pm
His name wasn’t Patrick O’Brian any more than CS Forester’s was CSF; it was Richard Patrick Russ, according to Dean King’s biography. What he really did…? Who knows? If he was doing secret work there’d have been a cover occupation, or it might just be another piece of fiction. But King is a careful researcher.
I don’t know, and lord knows I believe a writer has the right to a private life in hizzer lifetime. The books are so very good I don’t care if he was a visitor from Andromeda.
“Pat and Tess” have a wonderful little girl who just turned 5. And the one good thing about their losing the first baby… it finally convinced the mom’s parents that they really were a couple, and part of the family. Naturally they’re crazy about their granddaughter.
September 17, 2010 at 11:09 am
I feel the same about O’Brian’s writing, although I couldn’t help reading the stuff Nicolai Tolstoy wrote about him and linking it with Maturin in my bonce.
Awww for the happy ending. Just great.
September 17, 2010 at 9:11 pm
A self-insert starts being a Sue/Stu when zie becomes The Best. This is the person who can repair the engine better than Scotty, navigate better than Sulu, do emergency surgery when McCoy is out cold and even Spock cries when she dies. (From the original Ensign Mary Sue) She deforms the canon characters.
The fat lady perusing buttons in the gay bookstore? That’s me. But that’s all the mention she gets, ergo, self-insert. Now, if she intervened, won our hero away from the wiles of the incubus that’s consuming him, made him a nice man instead of a sexual predator and they settled down happily ever after? Mary Sue.
Obvious Sues/Stus:
Anita Blake. I devour these books with an unholy passion. She reminds me of another short, dark complected vampire writer from St. Louis.
PJF (I forgot his name) in the Riverworld series. Blatently Phillip Jose Farmer.
Edgar Rice Burroughs just wrote himself into the frame story. As himself.
September 18, 2010 at 8:18 pm
Angelia
Love the examples. (Think you’ve won on those for best MS/GS of the week.)
I rather like the Burroughs approach – cuts out all the rmiddle men.
Charlie